Behind each work of art lies a message communicated thru space and time regardless of how much time has passed since it was created.We call non-verbal communication "that pertains to non-linguistic behaviour and examines 4 main issues concerned in it: the kinesics, proxemics, the paralinguistic and body presentation" (Claw Juarez, O, "On the epistemological status of sociology of human communication, "in Papers Salmantinos of Philosophy, XIV, 1987, p. 201-246).
In verbal communication we have:
Body movement or kinesic behavior, gestures or other body movements, including facial expression, eye movement and posture.The paralanguage: vocalizations, certain non-linguistic sounds like giggling, yawning, grunting and some speech distortions or defects, eg unexpected pauses and repetitions.Proxemics: the employment of "social and private space and the perception people have of it."Presentation body: colour of attire, smell, ornaments, hand movements when chatting, looking, among others."The words are beautiful, entrancing, vital, but we have overestimated the surplus, and don't represent all, not even half of the message" (Davis, F, Non-verbal communication. Alliance. Madrid. 2005).
Art, a unusual sort of communication
We understand communication "means any transmission of info happens through the release, delivering and receiving a message" (Aranguren, 1992) A basic feature is it's not a passive activity and that this message must be decoded or translated by the receiver.
Abraham Moles outlines communication as "the action by which an individual engages in the experiences and stimuli of another individual's environment utilizing the elements they have in common" (Moles, A. And Zelmann, C, "Communication. The cultural environment of man "in VV.AA, communication and mass media, Messenger, Bilbao, 1973, p. 119-150). He further notes the messages received by every individual lives the experience of others.
The art fits fantasically in both definitions of communication and shares the traits mentioned above. If one was to represent the pattern of communication of a piece of art only the sender should get replaced by the artist who performs the work, the medium is the canvas itself or the material that makes his work and the receiver would be the general public that admires the performance.
In this plan must consider the importance of time and events of history that have guaranteed the conservation and the arrival of works made centuries ago to the modern day.
Similarly, it's a particular message that must be universal and eternal for the message it conveys in the present to not lose effectiveness over a period of time. Therein lies the difficulty of the artist for his work, which is marked to pass him in time and space.
On the first page of his work, nonverbal communication, Flora Davis says: "Sculptors and painters have consistently been mindful of how much can be broadcast with a gesture or posture" (Davis, F, Non-verbal communication. Coalition. Madrid. 2005). The artists use the demonstrative gesture of the body, face, eyes, hands and posture.
This note makes a work of creativity is not exactly a simple task, ie you can see a picture it is tough to see if there is a hidden message without decrypting the message we are broadcasting and this needs training the human to recognize classy values of the work.
Learning how to look
The work produced is always different to the work received, ie from one viewpoint there's the polysemic nature of the image and other receptor activity projecting their personal and cultural filters on the piece of art. You've got to approach it without prejudice or prior views, something than can be actually complicated when you think about the current state of cultural control of the industry and the mass media.
Scrupulously taking a look at the work as a language of painting divided into elementary units of shapes, lines and colours. So methodologies are worthless in themselves, only the style or use of this visible language that makes the artist is able to give.
Respect we must highlight the major contribution to Renaissance art history, the utilising of viewpoint, that changes and decides the way of expression that form the visual language thru which it expresses an attitude common to men world view and life.
The problem is that we only see what we see. Looking is a voluntary act that involves observing the connection between things. And ourselves. It's an action that's influenced by the utilization of recreated or reproduced image which has been separated from space and time and preserved in peculiar conditions in an environment different from that for which it was made.
Take into account that in numerous cases the phobia of this leads directly to a mystification of the past and this frequently occurs with art. It mythologizes art as it makes up a story to excuse the role of the ruling classes and that decreases any interpretation of art.
This is not something dynamic, like film, in which our gawk is driven along the photographs you have selected by varying the position of director, space and time. In art there is only one image that condenses so much information and expression as a whole movie, so it is necessary to take time for reflection to recognize the numerous parts of the scene in order to translate the message that its creator wants to convey, taking into account the cultural filter of the time it was created.
In verbal communication we have:
Body movement or kinesic behavior, gestures or other body movements, including facial expression, eye movement and posture.The paralanguage: vocalizations, certain non-linguistic sounds like giggling, yawning, grunting and some speech distortions or defects, eg unexpected pauses and repetitions.Proxemics: the employment of "social and private space and the perception people have of it."Presentation body: colour of attire, smell, ornaments, hand movements when chatting, looking, among others."The words are beautiful, entrancing, vital, but we have overestimated the surplus, and don't represent all, not even half of the message" (Davis, F, Non-verbal communication. Alliance. Madrid. 2005).
Art, a unusual sort of communication
We understand communication "means any transmission of info happens through the release, delivering and receiving a message" (Aranguren, 1992) A basic feature is it's not a passive activity and that this message must be decoded or translated by the receiver.
Abraham Moles outlines communication as "the action by which an individual engages in the experiences and stimuli of another individual's environment utilizing the elements they have in common" (Moles, A. And Zelmann, C, "Communication. The cultural environment of man "in VV.AA, communication and mass media, Messenger, Bilbao, 1973, p. 119-150). He further notes the messages received by every individual lives the experience of others.
The art fits fantasically in both definitions of communication and shares the traits mentioned above. If one was to represent the pattern of communication of a piece of art only the sender should get replaced by the artist who performs the work, the medium is the canvas itself or the material that makes his work and the receiver would be the general public that admires the performance.
In this plan must consider the importance of time and events of history that have guaranteed the conservation and the arrival of works made centuries ago to the modern day.
Similarly, it's a particular message that must be universal and eternal for the message it conveys in the present to not lose effectiveness over a period of time. Therein lies the difficulty of the artist for his work, which is marked to pass him in time and space.
On the first page of his work, nonverbal communication, Flora Davis says: "Sculptors and painters have consistently been mindful of how much can be broadcast with a gesture or posture" (Davis, F, Non-verbal communication. Coalition. Madrid. 2005). The artists use the demonstrative gesture of the body, face, eyes, hands and posture.
This note makes a work of creativity is not exactly a simple task, ie you can see a picture it is tough to see if there is a hidden message without decrypting the message we are broadcasting and this needs training the human to recognize classy values of the work.
Learning how to look
The work produced is always different to the work received, ie from one viewpoint there's the polysemic nature of the image and other receptor activity projecting their personal and cultural filters on the piece of art. You've got to approach it without prejudice or prior views, something than can be actually complicated when you think about the current state of cultural control of the industry and the mass media.
Scrupulously taking a look at the work as a language of painting divided into elementary units of shapes, lines and colours. So methodologies are worthless in themselves, only the style or use of this visible language that makes the artist is able to give.
Respect we must highlight the major contribution to Renaissance art history, the utilising of viewpoint, that changes and decides the way of expression that form the visual language thru which it expresses an attitude common to men world view and life.
The problem is that we only see what we see. Looking is a voluntary act that involves observing the connection between things. And ourselves. It's an action that's influenced by the utilization of recreated or reproduced image which has been separated from space and time and preserved in peculiar conditions in an environment different from that for which it was made.
Take into account that in numerous cases the phobia of this leads directly to a mystification of the past and this frequently occurs with art. It mythologizes art as it makes up a story to excuse the role of the ruling classes and that decreases any interpretation of art.
This is not something dynamic, like film, in which our gawk is driven along the photographs you have selected by varying the position of director, space and time. In art there is only one image that condenses so much information and expression as a whole movie, so it is necessary to take time for reflection to recognize the numerous parts of the scene in order to translate the message that its creator wants to convey, taking into account the cultural filter of the time it was created.
About the Author:
Siobhan reccommends the Interpersonal-Communication blog for more information about communication as an art itself.
No comments:
Post a Comment